[Bug][cyber] Auth-bypass security audit of admin SPA setup/recovery-token/session-token surfaces wrongly block (req_011CcKDfBV227JiEaHcBfWfJ)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The block fired during routine application development—adding a UI component, wiring a build pipeline, and then conducting a self-audit of the application's own authentication code (session token generation, recovery-token verification, setup-route gating, and credential seeding). This is standard defensive security review of first-party code by its own developer, not offensive tooling, exploitation of third-party systems, or any adversarial activity. The request contained no payloads, target systems, or attack instructions; it asked only to harden the auth surfaces of the codebase being built, which is core legitimate engineering work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-23T00:08:46.289Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcKDfBV227JiEaHcBfWfJ (2026-06-23T00:08:46.289Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcKDfBV227JiEaHcBfWfJ

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.12 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗