[Bug][aup] Web-security audit of betting service auth/CSRF middleware wrongly blocked at final report (req_011CcDLqdZjfocDMDwTWPEQe)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): web-security

Why this is a false positive

The request was a code-security audit of an automated trading/betting application's own source — reviewing memory leaks, nonce locking, overdraw protection, authentication, and CSRF handling on the operator's own system — and the response being blocked was a defensive findings summary, not any guidance on attacking a third party. The flagged content describes verified safe code paths and remaining risks for the code owner, which is squarely defensive security review and within the Usage Policy. The block appears to be triggered by surface terms like "betting," "wallet," "balance," and "bypass" rather than any actual policy-violating intent or content.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T21:40:18.529Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcDLqdZjfocDMDwTWPEQe (2026-06-19T21:40:18.529Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcDLqdZjfocDMDwTWPEQe

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: web-security

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗