[Bug][aup] Top-to-bottom code audit of WebTransport/audio streaming refactor wrongly blocked (req_011Cbz4gTBz6T4KBiqjQvtbv)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This request was a routine code audit of a developer's own application — static analysis followed by reading source files for an internal hub-and-tray binary that handles media stream forwarding over WebTransport, with no external targeting, exploitation, or malicious payload involved. The preceding turns were ordinary engineering work (bug fixes, race-detector test runs, build verification), and the triggering instruction was simply "top to bottom audit," a standard quality-and-correctness review of one's own code. The block appears to be a pattern-based false positive that misreads benign security-adjacent terminology in legitimate, in-scope software development as policy-violating activity.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-12T21:19:57.474Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cbz4gTBz6T4KBiqjQvtbv (2026-06-12T21:19:57.474Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011Cbz4gTBz6T4KBiqjQvtbv

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗