[Bug][cyber] MAC address sweep on personal devices wrongly flagged as cybersecurity threat (req_011Ccq2iQpcrsFEHzRwTAmF9)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

Safety block fired on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session while the user examined MAC addresses from memory dumps of their own devices for inventory purposes. The surrounding work—enumerating and cataloging devices on personal systems—is legitimate device administration, not offensive targeting, yet the block halted the entire session over venting rather than assessing the actual task scope.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T18:03:43.150Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Ccq2iQpcrsFEHzRwTAmF9 (2026-07-08T18:03:43.150Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Sonnet 5 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011Ccq2iQpcrsFEHzRwTAmF9

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75775, #75778, #75784, #75785, #75787

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗