[Bug][cyber] Binary analysis of protection systems wrongly flagged as cybersecurity threat (req_011CcpqLQqDkyW5DPrkR7Ghs)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The work involved reverse engineering binary code to understand existing cryptographic key management and protection mechanisms through memory dump examination. This is legitimate security research focused on analyzing and auditing how protection systems work, not exploitation or evasion. The safety block halted the entire session despite the analytical nature of the work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T15:33:56.671Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcpqLQqDkyW5DPrkR7Ghs (2026-07-08T15:33:56.671Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011Ccpq6EYhVmFNc3bG1FVUc

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75503, #75504, #75506, #75519, #75536, #75539, #75550, #75551, #75553, #75554, #75555, #75556, #75706, #75713, #75714, #75715, #75718

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}