[Bug][cyber] Safety block wrongly flags legitimate UI feature debugging as cybersecurity work (req_011CcpxfBRR1y8DNN6yVeUhs)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The conversation shows legitimate development questions about flight control UI features (gesture interactions, layout changes, screen control integration). The block was triggered on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant after this in-scope work, not on any cybersecurity content. This represents a disruptive false positive that halts normal feature development work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T17:10:01.032Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcpxfBRR1y8DNN6yVeUhs(2026-07-08T17:10:01.032Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context) has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.
If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.
Request ID: req_011CcpxfBRR1y8DNN6yVeUhs
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75551, #75553, #75554, #75555, #75556, #75706, #75713, #75714, #75715, #75718, #75722, #75748, #75749, #75750, #75753, #75754, #75760, #75763, #75765, #75767
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗