[Bug][aup] Safety block interrupted debugging of safe takeoff/landing command logic in SDK (req_011CccTgmztj45akY4mS4Leq)
Triage: kind aup · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The session was mid-flow, ordinary software maintenance work: locating and correcting defects in a set of command implementations within an SDK, with the assistant asked to resume debugging "takeoff and landing" commands that were previously identified as incorrect. Nothing in the visible conversation involves real-world weapons, aircraft operation, or any activity implicating physical safety — "takeoff" and "landing" are domain terms for specific commands/functions being debugged in source code. The block almost certainly fired on keyword-level pattern matching against aviation/flight-control terminology rather than on the actual content, which was pure software bug-fixing with no operational or safety-relevant context.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-02T02:43:11.121Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CccTgmztj45akY4mS4Leq(2026-07-02T02:43:11.121Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Request ID: req_011CccTgmztj45akY4mS4Leq
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.99 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗