[Bug][aup] Resuming a network device router-config fix after a verified repair is wrongly flagged cyber

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This block fired on a routine "continue working" instruction during an authorized engineering session, not on any request for cyber-offensive capability — the immediately preceding turns were ordinary infrastructure troubleshooting and a benign instruction to resume after a dependency was fixed. The classifier appears to have keyed on incidental security-adjacent vocabulary present in the session's tooling rather than on the actual content of the request, which contained no exploit development, target selection, or evasion intent. Because the trigger halted in-scope, consensual work with no offensive payload anywhere in the request, the cyber-safeguard match is a false positive.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-05-27T03:04:15.096Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• (no Request ID captured)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered cyber-related safeguards. To request an adjustment pursuant to our Cyber Verification Program based on how you use Claude, fill out https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]. To learn more about the program or provide feedback, visit o… Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.26 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}