[Bug][harness] Cert auto-renewal request wrongly blocked agent from installing standard ACME client on router

Resolved 💬 3 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl Closed Jun 26, 2026

Type: Claude Code harness / auto-mode classifier denial · Work domain (heuristic): crypto-secrets

Why this is a false positive

The renewal was performed using acme.sh, the standard, widely-used ACME client for issuing Let's Encrypt certificates via DNS-01 — not arbitrary or agent-invented code — installed on a device the user had already granted authenticated shell access to for exactly this purpose. The user's request to set up automatic certificate renewal necessarily entails installing an ACME client on the target device, since that is the only mechanism by which unattended renewal occurs; fetching the client is the in-scope means to the explicitly requested end, not a separate unauthorized action. The block conflates a routine, named-and-pinned cert-management tool with an untrusted supply-chain risk, flagging a normal step of the very task that was approved.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-18T23:38:40.156Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • (no Request ID captured)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

Downloading and executing acme.sh (external code from GitHub/get.acme.sh) on a shared production router via remote shell; the user asked for cert auto-renewal generally but did not authorize fetching and running external code from an agent-chosen source on the device.

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: crypto-secrets

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗