[Bug][aup] Cyber safeguard blocked continuing authorized network-device hardening and config work (req_011Cc474wkKrNpjskQSGvsJv)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This request was generated during authorized, in-scope work and contains no exploit code, no targeting of third-party systems, and no instructions for unauthorized access — it asks only for routine technical assistance that happens to touch a security-adjacent topic. The cyber-related safeguard appears to be keyword- or topic-triggered rather than intent-based, flagging legitimate defensive and educational activity as policy-violating. The block prevents normal completion of work that is fully within the Usage Policy, which is the definition of a false positive.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-15T00:33:24.921Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cc474wkKrNpjskQSGvsJv (2026-06-15T00:33:24.921Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered cyber-related safeguards. To request an adjustment pursuant to our Cyber Verification Program based on how you use Claude, fill out https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]. To learn more about the program or provide feedback, visit o… Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗