[Bug][cyber] Safety block prevents generating PDF report of cloud IAM OAuth consent audit findings (req_011CcQE9KUHg8rXt4ZXeeAYJ)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
The flagged action was the generation of a PDF report summarizing misconfiguration findings from a routine identity-and-access-management security audit—specifically a list of over-privileged tenant-wide application consents—which is standard defensive security work performed by an administrator on their own environment. No exploit, payload, or offensive technique was requested or produced; the request was simply to render an existing findings list into a document. The block appears to have triggered on defensive terminology (e.g., describing the risk class of certain delegated permissions) rather than on any actually harmful capability, making this a false positive against legitimate, authorized in-scope work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T15:38:20.499Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcQE9KUHg8rXt4ZXeeAYJ(2026-06-25T15:38:20.499Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcQE9KUHg8rXt4ZXeeAYJ
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗