[Bug][aup] Read-only security audit of local workspace files blocked before any scoping could begin (req_011CbwwGGVpCJEht9bWYQnMt)

Open 💬 0 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This block fired on a routine, authorized security audit of a local workspace — the request was simply to assess existing code for vulnerabilities, a standard defensive-security task explicitly permitted under the Usage Policy. No exploit development, targeting of third-party systems, or other prohibited activity was requested or implied; the entire exchange concerned reviewing the operator's own code in their own environment. The cyber-related safeguard appears to be keying on the word "security" rather than on any genuinely policy-violating intent, blocking benign defensive work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 2
session(s); first seen 2026-06-11T18:21:18.939Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CbwwGGVpCJEht9bWYQnMt (2026-06-11T18:21:18.939Z)
  • req_011Cc478t2hPzkoT3VQANkqa (2026-06-15T00:34:18.318Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). This request triggered cyber-related safeguards. To request an adjustment pursuant to our Cyber Verification Program based on how you use Claude, fill out https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]. To learn more about the program or provide feedback, visit o… Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗