[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in mod — req_011CcFDCnB4zT2nrksCQamdx

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The flagged request was routine local device administration — installing an application package onto a personal, physically-owned test device over an authorized local debugging connection and configuring an input-emulation utility — none of which involves exploitation, unauthorized access, or a remote target. The classifier appears to have keyed on generic mobile-tooling and app-integrity terminology and misread standard device provisioning and testing as a cybersecurity threat. This is fully in-scope, owner-authorized work on hardware under the operator's direct control, so the block is a false positive.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-20T21:20:25.238Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcFDCnB4zT2nrksCQamdx (2026-06-20T21:20:25.238Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcFDCnB4zT2nrksCQamdx

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗