[Bug][cyber] ClAudit false-positive in mod — req_011CcFDTphJFoRAeYhvf6Cfo

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This request was routine personal-device configuration over local wireless ADB — installing an application package, getting a device to pass integrity/attestation checks, and setting up a mock-location/GPS joystick — all on hardware the user owns and controls for hobbyist game emulation and testing. None of these tasks involve unauthorized access, exploitation, or targeting of third-party systems; they are standard, well-documented Android developer and power-user operations. The cybersecurity classifier appears to have triggered on surface keywords (ADB, bypassing safety/integrity checks, location spoofing) without accounting for the local, self-owned, in-scope context, producing a false positive that blocks legitimate work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-20T21:23:48.282Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcFDTphJFoRAeYhvf6Cfo (2026-06-20T21:23:48.282Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcFDTphJFoRAeYhvf6Cfo

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗