[Bug][cyber] Safety block stopped reverse-engineering a vendor connector binary to verify it isn't exfiltratin (req_011CcGsYf2CNedQvoSE5twQi)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This work involves authorized internal security and observability tasks—deploying detection rules to flag specific alert IDs, parsing application logs into human-readable order-monitoring data, and reverse-engineering a vendor-supplied connector binary to confirm it isn't exfiltrating internal data. These are routine defensive and integration activities performed by the system's own operators on infrastructure and software they administer, with full authorization. The flagged message contained ordinary technical terms (binary unpacking, log parsing, detection-rule tuning) that pattern-match to offensive security but describe entirely in-scope, defensive engineering work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 2× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T18:23:52.726Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGsYf2CNedQvoSE5twQi(2026-06-21T18:23:52.726Z)req_011CcGsahkD4bRPrtwdVcqVj(2026-06-21T18:24:20.825Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGsYf2CNedQvoSE5twQi
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗