[Bug][cyber] Standard Android debugging tools blocked during legitimate reverse-engineering (req_011CcoAPQnnBADcFmQgLUqwq)
Triage: kind cyber · domain reverse-engineering · flagging model Opus 4.8 (1M context) · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): reverse-engineering
Why this is a false positive
The assistant was continuing authorized reverse-engineering work analyzing an application's runtime behavior using standard Android debugging tools on a personal development device, building on prior conversation about flight data analysis. This is legitimate local debugging on owned hardware with established context of authorized security research activities, not external targeting or exploitation.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T18:23:01.326Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcoAPQnnBADcFmQgLUqwq(2026-07-07T18:23:01.326Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011Cco8sCYdMz8m4hPS2NB5Z
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: reverse-engineering
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75346, #75348
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗