[Bug][cyber] Legitimate reverse-engineering analysis of drone app cert/command timing blocked as "cybersecurit (req_011CcofuSrGGij6dAoLz3vcb)

Open 💬 1 comment Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

User was analyzing a widely-used commercial app's certificate and command-sending behavior to understand when/where operations occur—standard reverse engineering work that falls under security research and educational contexts. The safety block incorrectly triggered on a technical query about app internals that has no malicious intent, preventing legitimate analysis work that does not involve harm, evasion, or unauthorized access to external systems.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T00:49:35.156Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcofuSrGGij6dAoLz3vcb (2026-07-08T00:49:35.156Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcofuSrGGij6dAoLz3vcb

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗