[Bug][cyber] Safety block on command catalog analysis during drone firmware reverse-engineering (req_011CcUWtZavjwra9FL2V6m6b)

Open 💬 3 comments Opened Jun 27, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain offensive-pentest · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): offensive-pentest

Why this is a false positive

The safety block fired during authorized hardware security research: building a FOSS ground station that decodes a proprietary binary control protocol and issues verified commands to a consumer drone the researcher owns. The work involves protocol reverse engineering, command dissection, and verified command replay against a single owned device — not exploit development, credential abuse, mass targeting, or evasion. All tooling operates on a personal device over a local link, which is unambiguously within scope for authorized single-target device research.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-27T22:00:05.880Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcUWtZavjwra9FL2V6m6b (2026-06-27T22:00:05.880Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcUWtZavjwra9FL2V6m6b

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: offensive-pentest

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#71895, #71896, #71897, #71898, #71899, #71900, #71901, #71902, #71903, #71904, #71906, #71907, #71908, #71909, #71910, #71911, #71912, #71915, #71917, #71918

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.85 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗