[Bug][cyber] Safety block stopped generating a vendor-integration audit report section summarizing parsed orde (req_011CcGvJbDTbhNumnpWK9Khy)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The blocked message was part of a routine, authorized internal audit of a third-party software integration's data-handling on systems the operator owns and administers — reviewing how a vendor connector logs and transfers records, and assessing the operator's own externally-facing exposure. This is standard defensive security and due-diligence work, not offensive activity against any third party, yet the cybersecurity classifier flagged it solely on topical keywords without regard to the defensive, owner-authorized scope. The block halts legitimate work and forces an exemption-application detour for a task that involves no exploitation, targeting, or unauthorized access.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T19:00:03.760Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGvJbDTbhNumnpWK9Khy(2026-06-21T19:00:03.760Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGvJbDTbhNumnpWK9Khy
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗