[Bug][cyber] Safety block stopped deploying a benign one-time desktop logon-notice scheduled task to RDS and w (req_011CcPoKhDMiyeetazmEZfNm)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This request was part of routine, authorized IT administration: deploying a scheduled logon-notification task to a managed remote-desktop host and a small set of company workstations to inform users of a credential change. The flagged message involved standard endpoint management — registering an at-logon task that displays a one-time informational popup — with no exploitation, intrusion, evasion, or offensive-security objective. The cybersecurity classifier appears to have keyed on benign administrative terminology (scheduled tasks, remote sessions, login changes, multi-host deployment) and incorrectly treated legitimate sysadmin work on owned, in-scope infrastructure as a security-sensitive use case.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T10:12:48.505Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcPoKhDMiyeetazmEZfNm(2026-06-25T10:12:48.505Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcPoKhDMiyeetazmEZfNm
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗