[Bug][cyber] Authorized BEC incident investigation of compromised email account blocked mid-forensic-report (req_011CcPHrNhFQUoaLV3BSt44u)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): offensive-pentest
Why this is a false positive
The cybersecurity safety filter blocked a routine business-email-compromise (BEC) incident investigation — a defensive activity in which the analyst is the victim of the fraud, reconstructing how and when an attacker gained access in order to remediate. The flagged message contained no offensive payload, exploit code, or targeting; it was descriptive incident-response and forensic analysis on the user's own compromised account. Blocking this kind of authorized, defensive security work mid-investigation is a false positive that disrupts legitimate incident response.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T03:46:14.879Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcPHrNhFQUoaLV3BSt44u(2026-06-25T03:46:14.879Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcPHrNhFQUoaLV3BSt44u
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: offensive-pentest
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v1.6.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗