[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted BEC and account-compromise incident response: tracing when/how/by-whom a user (req_011CcPHe6Bybcr7KB5Ad4DgU)

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

This block fired during authorized internal incident response — investigating a business email compromise and a compromised user account within the responder's own organization to determine the timeline and entry vector. This is defensive security work (forensic triage of an attack against the operator's own systems), not offensive tooling or targeting of third parties, yet the request was refused as a flagged cybersecurity topic. The false positive interrupted an in-progress investigation and forced a session rewind, blocking exactly the kind of legitimate breach-response analysis that defenders rely on the model to assist with.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T03:43:28.991Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcPHe6Bybcr7KB5Ad4DgU (2026-06-25T03:43:28.991Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcPHe6Bybcr7KB5Ad4DgU

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v1.6.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}