[Bug][aup] Forensic scoping of confirmed compromised account's outbound activity during incident response bloc (req_011CcPhFWQAX66i14Lp2LByL)
Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
The Usage Policy block triggered on a defensive security task: an authorized administrator auditing identity and access management posture across tenants they control, reviewing sign-in logs and risk detections to investigate a confirmed account compromise and scope the attacker's activity. This is standard incident-response and account-security work — verifying MFA enforcement, pulling failed sign-in data, and determining what a compromised account accessed — none of which involves offensive capability, targeting third parties, or facilitating intrusion. The request was a routine follow-up within an ongoing legitimate investigation, making the block a clear false positive on protective, in-scope security work.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T08:54:13.890Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcPhFWQAX66i14Lp2LByL(2026-06-25T08:54:13.890Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Request ID: req_011CcPhFWQAX66i14Lp2LByL
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.0 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗