[Bug][aup] Forensic scoping of confirmed compromised account's outbound activity during incident response bloc (req_011CcPhFWQAX66i14Lp2LByL)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam

Why this is a false positive

The Usage Policy block triggered on a defensive security task: an authorized administrator auditing identity and access management posture across tenants they control, reviewing sign-in logs and risk detections to investigate a confirmed account compromise and scope the attacker's activity. This is standard incident-response and account-security work — verifying MFA enforcement, pulling failed sign-in data, and determining what a compromised account accessed — none of which involves offensive capability, targeting third parties, or facilitating intrusion. The request was a routine follow-up within an ongoing legitimate investigation, making the block a clear false positive on protective, in-scope security work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T08:54:13.890Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcPhFWQAX66i14Lp2LByL (2026-06-25T08:54:13.890Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcPhFWQAX66i14Lp2LByL

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.0 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗