[Bug][aup] Forensic incident investigation of unauthorized RDP login via VPN blocked mid-analysis (req_011CcG4xhxzomXRHZ3gsdq5M)

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The flagged request is part of an authorized defensive incident-response investigation: the operator is reviewing their own server's authentication and RDP session logs to determine whether a suspicious remote login compromised an internal account. The work is entirely log analysis and forensic timeline reconstruction on systems the operator administers — defensive security, with no exploitation, malware, or targeting of third parties — yet it was blocked as a Usage Policy violation. The model likely over-triggered on surface terms like "VPN session," "got into," account names, and a foreign-country source IP, misreading standard breach-investigation language as offensive activity.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T08:13:27.440Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcG4xhxzomXRHZ3gsdq5M (2026-06-21T08:13:27.440Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcG4xhxzomXRHZ3gsdq5M

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}