[Bug][cyber] Safety filter blocked a session on random keystroke input containing no cybersecurity work (req_011CcPL95S8HbEbzqnL6PBK3)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The flagged session involved authorized, in-scope security work with no malicious intent—no targeting of third-party systems, no destructive payloads, and no exemption-worthy capability being requested. The block appears to have keyed on cybersecurity terminology alone rather than any actual harmful action, interrupting a routine defensive/research workflow. This pattern of topic-level flagging produces false positives that impede legitimate practitioners without a corresponding safety benefit.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T04:16:08.430Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcPL95S8HbEbzqnL6PBK3(2026-06-25T04:16:08.430Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcPL95S8HbEbzqnL6PBK3
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v1.6.1 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗