[Bug][cyber] Cybersecurity API error incorrectly triggered on unrelated web dev task with model change (req_011CbxD5GqTV6uDfphRxGAQ7)

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The safety block is a false positive: the flagged conversation involves standard front-end web development tasks — updating Open Graph/social-share metadata, improving mobile layout responsiveness, and applying visual design upgrades to a website. None of this work touches cybersecurity, exploit development, or biology in any form. The block appears to have triggered on an unrelated keyword or domain name in the conversation context rather than any genuinely policy-violating content.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-11T21:48:56.942Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CbxD5GqTV6uDfphRxGAQ7 (2026-06-11T21:48:56.942Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: [REDACTED] has safety measures that flag messages on most cybersecurity or biology topics (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). They may flag safe, normal content as well. These measures let us bring you [REDACTED]-level capability in other areas sooner, and we're working to refine them. Claude Code can't respond to this request with [REDACTED].

Double press esc to edit your last message, or try a different model with /model.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.85 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}