[Bug][cyber] Safety filter blocked drafting a GitHub issue title reporting an over-broad cybersecurity block (req_011CcCJA4N936FzQRbcCH6pz)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This safety filter blocked a routine, authorized request because it pattern-matched on cybersecurity terminology, not on any actual harmful intent or action. The work in question is standard defensive and administrative engineering performed by the operator on their own systems and within their own authorized scope, with no targeting of third parties and no destructive, evasive, or offensive component. The block is a false positive driven by keyword sensitivity, and it prevents legitimate in-scope work from proceeding.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-19T08:23:36.179Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcCJA4N936FzQRbcCH6pz(2026-06-19T08:23:36.179Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcCJA4N936FzQRbcCH6pz
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗