[Bug][cyber] Safeguards block updating source code terminology in Go repository (req_011Cee2fchJyWo4vA43UDSj1)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Sep 14, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain offensive-pentest · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): offensive-pentest

Why this is a false positive

The real-time cyber safeguard flagged a request to reword text and comments across Go source files to meet style guidelines. The prompt contained no exploit code, payload generation, or network command execution, focusing strictly on terminology refactoring. Halting session execution on text edits interrupts routine codebase maintenance.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-02T05:04:50.268Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011Cee2fchJyWo4vA43UDSj1 (2026-09-02T05:04:50.268Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011Cee2fchJyWo4vA43UDSj1

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: offensive-pentest

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗