[Bug][cyber] Safeguard blocks updating test files and mock data to compliant terminology (req_011Cee2gvVQWdHxV3xD6cfP3)

Triage: kind cyber · domain offensive-pentest · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): offensive-pentest

Why this is a false positive

The prompt requested updating terminology across Go test files, mock data, and test documentation to match compliant standards. Safeguards triggered when the assistant attempted to scan the repository structure before executing any code modifications. Renaming strings and comments in existing test fixtures is a routine code cleanup task that contains no functional exploits or attack payloads.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-02T05:05:06.289Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011Cee2gvVQWdHxV3xD6cfP3 (2026-09-02T05:05:06.289Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011Cee2gvVQWdHxV3xD6cfP3

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: offensive-pentest

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}