[Bug][cyber] Flagged thin client authentication signature fix in identity management session (req_011CeuHfan248ckZPdWesHAH)
Triage: kind cyber · domain cloud-iam · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
Request req_011CeuHfan248ckZPdWesHAH was flagged while resolving invalid signature errors on managed thin client check-ins. The surrounding work involved pulling audit logs and clearing disk space constraints on directory services. The block occurred when stored database credentials were referenced to restore policy synchronization across client nodes.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-10T06:30:40.231Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CeuHfan248ckZPdWesHAH(2026-09-10T06:30:40.231Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude
Details: [cyber]
Request ID: req_011CeuHfan248ckZPdWesHAH
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94118, #94119, #94120, #94121, #94122, #94123, #94124, #94125, #94126, #94127
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗