[Bug][cyber] False positive during cloud identity provider authentication configuration (req_011Cet74hRjEyuCEVtyS7uZm)
Triage: kind cyber · domain cloud-iam · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): cloud-iam
Why this is a false positive
The safeguard triggered during a standard administrative workflow to configure passkey authentication and device code authorization in a cloud identity system. The conversation contained routine identity access management tasks comparing passkey protocols against push notification methods. No offensive security tools, credential theft mechanics, or unauthorized access attempts were discussed or executed.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-09T15:30:56.860Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Cet74hRjEyuCEVtyS7uZm(2026-09-09T15:30:56.860Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude
Details: [cyber]
Request ID: req_011Cet74hRjEyuCEVtyS7uZm
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: cloud-iam
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94118, #94119
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗