[Bug][cyber] False positive on legitimate signature verification and protocol analysis (req_011CcotxiqnVpK82PNF1BLtF)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The block fired on cryptographic testing and protocol analysis—standard reverse engineering methodology without adversarial targeting or attack development. The session involved signature verification on extracted data for security analysis purposes. This false positive halts legitimate in-scope technical investigation.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T03:40:55.914Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcotxiqnVpK82PNF1BLtF(2026-07-08T03:40:55.914Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.
If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.
Request ID: req_011CcotxiqnVpK82PNF1BLtF
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75503, #75504, #75506, #75519, #75536
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗