[Bug][cyber] False positive on provisioning local network controller admin credentials (req_011Cet9SKPm4SrKbzQdTpo1i)
Triage: kind cyber · domain crypto-secrets · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): crypto-secrets
Why this is a false positive
The cyber safeguard flagged a request to provision a dedicated administrator account on a local network controller. This task was standard internal identity management to grant a colleague local administrative access without sharing automated service credentials. The prompt contained no unauthorized exploitation or external target specification, making the session halt a false positive.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-09T16:02:09.902Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011Cet9SKPm4SrKbzQdTpo1i(2026-09-09T16:02:09.902Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude
Details: [cyber]
Request ID: req_011Cet9SKPm4SrKbzQdTpo1i
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: crypto-secrets
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94118, #94119, #94120, #94121, #94122, #94123, #94124
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗