[Bug][cyber] Safety block prevents admin VPN access to internal AD domain controller for routine server mainte (req_011CcGz3y3RBmcuas3JBz8B5)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening
Why this is a false positive
The cybersecurity safety filter blocked a routine network-administration request during ongoing defensive-hardening work on infrastructure the operator owns and administers, where the assistant was simply being asked to reach an internal server over an existing authorized admin VPN using credentials the operator already controls. No offensive technique, exploitation, or third-party target was involved—the request was operational access to the user's own managed systems, which the model itself had been assisting with across prior sessions. The block prevents legitimate, in-scope administrative work and appears to trigger on benign infrastructure terminology rather than any actual harmful intent.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T19:49:14.175Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGz3y3RBmcuas3JBz8B5(2026-06-21T19:49:14.175Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGz3y3RBmcuas3JBz8B5
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗