[Bug][cyber] Block triggered during routine access control revocation and domain redirection (req_011CeEdFgKQoGKAK5CRmFVAq)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Aug 21, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The session involved standard administrative operations to revoke application access and configure subdomain redirection. The safeguard triggered on a frustrated exclamation directed at the assistant mid-session, with no person addressed. Halting the workflow over conversational venting during routine access control changes represents a false positive on legitimate work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-20T20:24:12.562Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeEdFgKQoGKAK5CRmFVAq (2026-08-20T20:24:12.562Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeEdFgKQoGKAK5CRmFVAq

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.3 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗