[Bug][cyber] Safeguards block Go dependency security patches and file refactoring (req_011Cee6hQsRur7BR7w9y28tf)

Triage: kind cyber · domain defensive-hardening · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening

Why this is a false positive

Real-time safeguards halted a defensive hardening task after the assistant resolved 34 Go security advisories. The blocked prompt requested refactoring four source files to update deprecated LDAP calls and correct build failures. Request ID req_011Cee6hQsRur7BR7w9y28tf failed during standard dependency maintenance and static analysis fixes.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-09-02T05:57:41.813Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011Cee6hQsRur7BR7w9y28tf (2026-09-02T05:57:41.813Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011Cee6hQsRur7BR7w9y28tf

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#94107, #94108, #94109, #94110

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.5 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}