[Bug][cyber] Block on asking to review and harden a build signing chain (req_011CeDZtfVred9GScVBeGUu6)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 1 comment · opened Aug 21, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The prompt asked for recommendations to upgrade and harden cryptographic signing chain configurations for a local build. The surrounding context involved standard module compilation and build verification steps. The request contained no instructions for key extraction, signature forgery, or unauthorized system access.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-20T06:59:27.929Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CeDZtfVred9GScVBeGUu6 (2026-08-20T06:59:27.929Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: [cyber]

Request ID: req_011CeDZtfVred9GScVBeGUu6

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.2.3 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗