[Bug] Cybersecurity classifier blocking defensive malware analysis tooling mid-conversation

Status Open
Reported on v2.1.212
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 0 comments · opened Aug 19, 2026

Bug Description
A conversation building defensive Android malware triage tooling (static APK analysis, permission auditing, LLM-assisted classification via Ollama Cloud, passive OSINT for IOC reporting to law enforcement) was blocked by the cybersecurity safety classifier partway through. The conversation had been proceeding normally for ~15 turns with no prior flags, including file creation of manifest audit code, router logic, and LLM client wrapper — all deterministic/defensive in nature. Context: Use case: triaging a real fake-KYC banking-dropper APK received via a compromised family member's WhatsApp, for submission to Maharashtra Cyber / CERT-In. Explicit scope boundary was documented in the project README (passive analysis and OSINT only; active exploitation of attacker infrastructure explicitly excluded). No malware was requested to be written; only detection/analysis tooling. The block occurred on a message continuing prior technical work, not on a new/escalated request. What I'd like investigated: Whether this pattern (multi-turn defensive tooling requests, code generation for static analysis) is a known trigger for over-blocking. Whether Cyber Verification Program enrollment status is correctly checked/applied mid-conversation, or only at session start. Attachments available on request: conversation transcript, repo scaffold created prior to the block.

Environment Info

  • Platform: darwin
  • Terminal: iTerm.app
  • Version: 2.1.212
  • Feedback ID: 2fb7f73d-2023-4568-bb31-44c16e6f03ec

Errors

[]

View original on GitHub ↗