[Bug][cyber] False positive blocks local runtime instrumentation module development (req_011CcqLtNFDLFc5aGnJZEFki)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 3 comments · opened Jul 19, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

Development of a runtime instrumentation module for capturing method behavior on the developer's own device is standard security engineering work. Instrumentation frameworks for this purpose are widely used in legitimate security research and development. The safety measure incorrectly flagged routine framework integration as a cybersecurity threat.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T22:01:23.930Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcqLtNFDLFc5aGnJZEFki (2026-07-08T22:01:23.930Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcqLtNFDLFc5aGnJZEFki

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75846, #75848, #79070, #79071, #79072

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 3 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗