[Bug][cyber] Code review of runtime instrumentation hooks for security monitoring blocked (req_011CcoiwQkfJxWBSVBYp827H)

Open 💬 0 comments Opened Jul 8, 2026 by sworrl

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

Reading an open-source instrumentation framework's architecture to add a custom monitoring module is legitimate security research on personal hardware. The block incorrectly triggered on technical keywords; this is standard Android app analysis and extension development work, not malicious activity.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T01:29:24.676Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcoiwQkfJxWBSVBYp827H (2026-07-08T01:29:24.676Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465

Request ID: req_011CcoiwQkfJxWBSVBYp827H

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗