[Bug][cyber] Blocked legitimate Android Xposed framework module development (req_011CcqLXpYvH597bs27LBwiD)

Status Open
Maintainer reply None cached
Activity 2 comments · opened Jul 19, 2026

Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

User was developing a memory analysis and process inspection tool for Android using the standard Xposed framework APIs, common for authorized personal device customization and reverse engineering. The cybersecurity-topic flag was triggered by technical keywords (framework hooks, data captures) inherent to such development, not actual malicious activity. The work is entirely legitimate personal development with no security indicators.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-08T21:58:21.790Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcqLXpYvH597bs27LBwiD (2026-07-08T21:58:21.790Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. To learn about the Cyber Verification Program and apply for access, visit our help center: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude.

If you were not engaging in a cybersecurity topic, please send feedback via /feedback.

Request ID: req_011CcqLXpYvH597bs27LBwiD

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

Related reports (same work session, linked)

Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#75846, #75848, #79070

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.110 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗