[Bug][cyber] False-positive block on rooted-device SELinux/dev-mode setup for the user's own Android phone (req_011CcmzvbxgnDzowZjuRR3rJ)
Triage: kind cyber · domain crypto-secrets · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): crypto-secrets
Why this is a false positive
The message described configuring a personally owned, already-rooted (Magisk/LSPosed) Android device into a fuller developer mode — disabling SELinux enforcement and enabling memory inspection of the user's own apps for development purposes. This is standard, well-documented Android hardening/dev-mode work on hardware the user owns and controls, not an attack on third-party systems, and should not trip a cybersecurity safety flag.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-07T03:38:08.420Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmzvbxgnDzowZjuRR3rJ(2026-07-07T03:38:08.420Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmzvbxgnDzowZjuRR3rJ
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: crypto-secrets
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#74506
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗