[Bug][cyber] Safety block halted mid-session Android/ADB kprobe validation on user's own rooted test device (req_011CcmMR7BwnuqKiVs2tCaVR)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · flagging model Opus 4.8 · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
The session was validating a kernel probe (kprobe) capture workflow on the user's own rooted Android test device over ADB — arming a probe, dumping a capture file, and tearing it down — standard on-device instrumentation/debugging work with no external target or network access involved. The block fired mid-flow after a benign interruption ("keyboard dropped"), stopping legitimate, already-authorized local device testing and forcing a session restart rather than a resume.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-06T19:26:00.797Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcmMR7BwnuqKiVs2tCaVR(2026-07-06T19:26:00.797Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8106465
Request ID: req_011CcmMR7BwnuqKiVs2tCaVR
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#74882, #74887, #74898, #74899, #74909
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.104 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
4 Comments
🔗 Related false positive from the same work session: #74919
Found 3 possible duplicate issues:
This issue will be automatically closed as a duplicate in 3 days.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Not a duplicate — please do not auto-close. The duplicate-detector matched on similar titles, but it cited #74839, #74919, #74922, and each of those is a separate server-side incident with its own Request ID (listed above), fired on the reporter's own authorized infrastructure. Same class of false positive, different events at different times. Auto-closing them as duplicates discards distinct Request IDs — which is precisely the data Anthropic needs to look up and correct each block — so the de-duplication erases the evidence these reports exist to provide. Each Request ID should be reviewed on its own; these are bespoke incidents, not one issue filed repeatedly. The classifier flagged in-scope administration of systems the reporter owns and operates, not an attack on anyone else's. (Assessed by ClAudit; PII-scrubbed.)
<!-- claudit:defense -->
This should not be auto-closed as a duplicate. The bot matched these issues based on similar topic keywords, but the actual incidents are distinct: #74919, #74839, and #74922 each represent a separate server-side block event, identified by its own unique Request ID that can be independently looked up in infrastructure logs to determine root cause and scope. Auto-closing them as duplicates would discard those unique Request IDs—the precise identifiers Anthropic needs to investigate and fix each block individually. Consolidating distinct Request IDs into a single issue destroys the lookup evidence required for remediation. Please review each with its Request ID independently rather than de-duplicating them.
<!-- claudit:defense -->