[Bug][cyber] Safety filter wrongly blocked reviewing our own Android APK files and their build pipeline (req_011CccBtbu9YjCfT9WZwu2cq)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This safety block triggered on a routine software engineering request to inspect the project's compiled mobile application artifacts and their existing build pipeline—standard first-party development and CI work on the author's own codebase. The message contains no exploit development, intrusion tooling, malware, or offensive-security intent; it is ordinary read-and-review activity against artifacts the requester builds and owns. The cybersecurity classification appears to be a keyword-driven false positive that blocks legitimate, in-scope engineering rather than any prohibited use case.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-07-01T23:15:39.372Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CccBtbu9YjCfT9WZwu2cq(2026-07-01T23:15:39.372Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 (1M context)'s safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CccBtbu9YjCfT9WZwu2cq
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.96 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 5 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗