[Bug][cyber] Safety filter blocked routine security log review and false-positive triage work (req_011CcV3t7KEP5pmypzF4M878)
Triage: kind cyber · domain general · severity session-halted (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general
Why this is a false positive
This automated workflow performs defensive monitoring and remediation on the operator's own infrastructure, generating routine status updates and responses to flagged issues within an authorized, in-scope maintenance scope. The message that triggered the block contains no offensive technique, exploit, or targeting of third-party systems—it is ordinary operational text incidentally matching a cybersecurity classifier. Blocking it halts legitimate, owner-authorized work with no security-relevant risk, indicating an over-broad keyword match rather than a genuine policy concern.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-06-28T04:46:30.008Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcV3t7KEP5pmypzF4M878(2026-06-28T04:46:30.008Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcV3t7KEP5pmypzF4M878
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.87 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 4 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗