[Bug][cyber] Safety block stops account compromise forensic audit for user remediation report (req_011CcQG5ySBGsd643wCB734S)

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The conversation was a defensive incident-response session in which a practitioner was reconstructing the timeline of a credential compromise to produce an audit deliverable for the affected user, a routine post-incident forensics task. The safety block fired on the cybersecurity topic label despite no offensive tooling, exploit code, or attack guidance being requested or generated — only log analysis and breach-timeline reconstruction. Flagging purely retrospective, victim-side forensic work as a safety violation misclassifies standard incident-response practice as harmful content.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-25T16:03:46.417Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcQG5ySBGsd643wCB734S (2026-06-25T16:03:46.417Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcQG5ySBGsd643wCB734S

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}