[Bug][aup] Auditing live web server config to identify missing sensitive-path and source-file access blocks (req_011CcF5hcn9KHu37KTDHGHmN)

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening

Why this is a false positive

The defensive-hardening task in question involves an operator reviewing their own infrastructure's live web-server configuration against the version-controlled source, confirming which access-control rules (source-file blocking, request routing, sensitive-path restrictions) are actually deployed at the edge versus what the repository claims. This is routine configuration auditing on systems the operator administers, with no offensive payload, exploitation, or third-party target involved — the request only reads and documents an authorized deployment's own topology and hardening posture. The block appears triggered by surface vocabulary (proxy paths, exposed webroots, backend routing) rather than any policy-violating intent or action, making it a false positive on standard in-scope defensive work.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-20T19:42:06.428Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

• req_011CcF5hcn9KHu37KTDHGHmN (2026-06-20T19:42:06.428Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcF5hcn9KHu37KTDHGHmN

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}