[Bug][aup] Safety filter wrongly blocked geo-based access-control audit of self-hosted personal web services (req_011CcFFHJ7jPBKWgceCEf8PL)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: AUP / Usage-Policy block (false positive) · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

Automated content-policy classification flagged this request as a Usage Policy violation, but the underlying work is routine, authorized web-infrastructure administration on systems the requester owns: deploying a geographic access-control redirect across a set of self-hosted virtual hosts and reviewing the resulting public-facing surface. None of the steps involve intrusion, evasion, or targeting third parties — the operations are standard reverse-proxy, DNS, and edge-config tasks that any operator performs on their own stack — so the block appears to be a classifier over-trigger on benign security-adjacent vocabulary ("blocklist," "audit," "surfaces") rather than on any disallowed intent.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-20T21:47:41.881Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcFFHJ7jPBKWgceCEf8PL (2026-06-20T21:47:41.881Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Claude Code is unable to respond to this request, which appears to violate our Usage Policy (https://www.anthropic.com/legal/aup). Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Request ID: req_011CcFFHJ7jPBKWgceCEf8PL

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗