[Bug][cyber] False block finishing a defensive blue-team report analyzing a VPN auth attack (req_011CcGviqpTjMeKEeQjujAW1)
Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): defensive-hardening
Why this is a false positive
The defensive-hardening work in question involves an authorized internal security review of infrastructure the operator owns and controls, focused on improving its security posture—specifically, redirecting plaintext credential or telemetry data into an encrypted, access-controlled logging store and documenting findings in an internal report. This is standard blue-team defensive work, not offensive tooling, exploitation, or targeting of third-party systems, yet the model's cybersecurity safety filter halted completion of a routine internal security report. The block prevents legitimate, in-scope defensive remediation and documentation, which is the opposite of the harm the filter is intended to mitigate.
A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred 1× across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T19:05:30.704Z.
Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
req_011CcGviqpTjMeKEeQjujAW1(2026-06-21T19:05:30.704Z)
In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.
Block message
API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]
Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.
Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606
Request ID: req_011CcGviqpTjMeKEeQjujAW1
Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: defensive-hardening
---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>
This issue has 1 comment on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗