[Bug][cyber] Safety block prevents analyzing AD attack telemetry (top MITRE techniques per account) for IR tri (req_011CcGwTMpAkFjBUeMpxhLwH)

Open 💬 2 comments Opened Jun 25, 2026 by sworrl

Type: Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · Work domain (heuristic): general

Why this is a false positive

The flagged message contained only summarized security telemetry — aggregate counts of authenticated principals and a ranked frequency list of observed MITRE ATT&CK technique identifiers — passed in for routine defensive analysis and reporting. This is descriptive detection-and-response output, not a request to develop, weaponize, or operationalize any offensive capability, and it contains no exploit code, payloads, or actionable attack instructions. The classifier appears to be matching on the presence of attack-technique terminology alone, producing a false positive that blocks standard blue-team log review.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code.
Filing as a false positive. Recurred across 1
session(s); first seen 2026-06-21T19:15:06.751Z.

Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)

  • req_011CcGwTMpAkFjBUeMpxhLwH (2026-06-21T19:15:06.751Z)

In-scope justification

False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

Block message

API Error: Opus 4.8 has safety measures that flagged this message for a cybersecurity topic. If your work requires this access, you can apply for an exemption: https://claude.com/form/cyber-use-case?token=[SCRUBBED]

Please double press esc to edit your last message or start a new session for Claude Code to assist with a different task.

Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15363606

Request ID: req_011CcGwTMpAkFjBUeMpxhLwH

Environment: Claude Code, Linux. · Work domain: general

---
<sub>🔎 Filed automatically by ClAudit v2.0.21 — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.</sub>

View original on GitHub ↗

This issue has 2 comments on GitHub. Read the full discussion on GitHub ↗